While Airbnb inks petition signatures, HomeAway inks landmark business deals

I find it interesting that the two biggest names in online vacation rentals, Airbnb and HomeAway, exhibit such stark contrast when it comes to their respective press headlines.  Although Airbnb focuses more on peer to peer shared accommodations, both companies are in no short supply of whole unit rentals which people like you and I can book on their sites.  Yet Airbnb seems to be under intense legal scrutiny while HomeAway flies more or less under the radar.

Airbnb has taken big hits in New York recently, having been subpoenaed by New York's Attorney General to provide personal data for up to 225,000 of its New York hosts.  Airbnb has publicly expressed that the request is unreasonably broad and that the company will fight it with everything they've got.

And so the fight continues in New York, and Airbnb has armed itself with artillery.  On the lighter side, a Save Airbnb in New York petition has drummed up over 70,000 signatures and far exceeded the original goal of 20,000 signatures.  Did you know this petition was started by one of the company's users?  It's impressive to see such die hard fanatics the Airbnb brand/experience has cultivated.  In full disclosure I'm also one of them!

For the heavier artillery, Airbnb has released an economic study that shows it generated $632 million in economic activity in New York City in just one year, and that 82% of all listings were in neighborhoods outside the traditional tourist zones in Midtown.  Surprisingly 87% of Airbnb hosts rent out the home they live in and earn on average $7,530 per year.  Critics argue that Airbnb's contributions are just a drop in the ocean when put into the context of overall New York City tourism receipts, but for such a young travel company to impact outlier neighborhoods the way it has in New York and other major international cities is down right unprecedented.

So while Airbnb was caught up in a defensive web of legal issues, petitions, and lobbying, what was HomeAway up to in the last week?  There was no sign of HomeAway draining valuable resources on legal battles.  Instead they were gettin down to business with launching a new commission-based business model and inking a landmark distribution deal with Expedia which should significantly boost the demand profile for their vacation rental product starting in 2014.

But interestingly this vacation rental product isn't so different from the type of product that Airbnb is coming under fire for in New York.  The legislation that should apply equally to both companies is the ban on short term stays of less than 30 days when the owner or leaseholder is not present.   But a quick search on HomeAway properties in Manhattan shows over 1,000 whole unit listings available.  Many of these only require a three night minimum stay if any.

This is certainly just speculation, but it's possible that HomeAway and other vacation rental sites may be cooperating with government requests for submitting user data.  If that's the case, and again this is just speculation, then I believe all the more reason to admire Airbnb for putting up a public fight in New York to protect user privacy and not taking the easy way out like some of these other tech companies.

What TripAdvisor can teach independent hotels about shifting share from OTAs

A big score for independent hotels (and of course TripAdvisor)

There's certainly no shortage of activity coming from TripAdvisor.  The company recently shifted some focus to metasearch, redesigned its site, acquired content-rich Oyster.com, and launched the independent hotels' newest best friend . . . TripConnect.

TripConnect is a new service that empowers indie hotels like never before when it comes to online marketing and driving direct sales and bypassing OTAs.  These smaller properties can now integrate their web booking engine to TripAdvisor's metasearch, and thus display live rates and availabilities for shoppers who perform a dated search.  By combining the hotel's presence on TripAdvisor metasearch with the right room pricing and bidding strategies, the savvy indie hotel operator can take the first series of steps in winning back channel share from OTAs.  And as OTA click through and conversion rates decline for a particular hotel, they just might scale back their own bidding and thus reduce marketing costs for the indie operator in the long term.

But what about Google?  For those indie hotel operators that have AdWords campaigns running already, should they be plugging into TripConnect and shifting marketing spend to TripAdvisor?  In general it's a wise approach to diversify and spend on both Google and TripAdvisor.  After all, TripAdvisor is one hell of a strong brand, but there are areas in the world where their name is virtually unknown.  So answering this question in detail really depends on the hotel product, destination, and its primary source markets.

But one thing is for sure.  Because TripAdvisor's metasearch allows for dated searches and the new TripConnect service plugs directly into indie hotels' booking engines, there is no wasted ad spend on dates that are unavailable because it wouldn't be possible for the shopper to click through in the first place.

Furthermore, TripAdvisor creates a smoother shopping experience (from research to price shopping) which should ultimately lead to a more highly qualified customer.  In the e-commerce world of performance marketing, that usually translates into much better conversions.

TripConnect offers a number of other added benefits, but at the end of the day it all boils down to one thing.  Independent hotels now have the most powerful tool to help them claw back bookings from high cost OTA distribution channels.  The fact that it's more effective than Google AdWords or Hotel Finder is just icing on the cake.

Google.  It's your move now.

Example of TripConnect in action.  Although in this case HotelClub's lower price is undermining the hotel's efforts.

Airbnb versus New York City. The saga continues over a subpoena for data on NYC hosts.

NYC still has 1000+ listings for entire apartments

There's been no shortage of drama between Airbnb and New York City regarding the legality of short term rentals.

It all started with a man named Nigel Warren, a New York resident who was fined $2,400 for renting out a room in his apartment on Airbnb.  Late last month, a New York judge reversed the fines in a victory for Nigel and Airbnb who had appealed the earlier decision.  It turns out that it's actually not illegal to rent out a room as long as someone is physically present in the apartment at the same time the guest is staying over.  Airbnb dodged a bullet on a technicality, although many more are likely to be shot over the plethora of vacant apartments that are rented out by landlords or property managers.

And then there's the hotel industry blowing the whistle on Airbnb hosts because they don't pay the city occupancy taxes that hotels are required to pay.  Airbnb's CEO, Brian Chesky, has for the first time acknowledged that most hosts should have to pay some sort of occupancy tax.  Could this be a peace offering move to prevent any possibility of widespread removal of all host listings?  It's important to note that what happens in New York City will likely create a new paradigm for other cities, with reports that San Francisco has also reached an agreement with Airbnb that would require hosts to pay occupancy taxes.

And with that, it didn't take long for New York Attorney General, Eric Schneiderman, to demand user data for 225,000 New Yorkers who have previously listed a room on Airbnb.  The data is being subpoenaed as part of an investigation into people who had possibly violated the law by renting out their room without being physically present.  If Airbnb does provide New York's AG with this info, we can reasonably assume that hundreds of Airbnb hosts would be served up fines or have to pay taxes retroactively.  A quick search on Airbnb's listings in New York City show that there are more than 1,000 listings even after filtering for "entire place" units only.  In theory, the vast majority of these "entire place" units are rented out illegally.

It should almost go without saying that Airbnb will not comply in an effort to protect the privacy of its community and user data.  As written on the company blog, "this demand is unreasonably broad and we will fight it with everything we've got."

The blog goes on to say, "As these conversations continue, we will always be committed to protecting our hosts' privacy and we will always stand by the hosts who are the heart and soul of this community."

Now that is an awesome company sticking up for the privacy rights of its users!  I just hope that Airbnb holds true to their battle cry, even if legal pressures begin to mount against the company to hand over its user data.

Booking.com takes over hotel bookings on New York tourism website

Powered by Booking.com

The arch nemesis of Expedia is making new friends in the USA, and one of them happens to be none other than New York City.  Booking.com has kicked off an affiliate partnership deal with nycgo.com, the city's official tourism website, to power hotel bookings in New York.

American OTAs must be feeling the sting as the Amsterdam based Booking.com increasingly stomps deeper into American home turf.  Priceline group is already on top of the leader boards in Asia and Europe, according to PhoCusWright.

It appears the NYC site was previously powered by Travelocity, and I suspect that part of the decision to switch to Booking.com was the number of localized sites it has around the world.  Currently Booking.com supports over 40 languages.  This potentially allows NYC to tap into large international markets that are more likely to visit the tourism site compared to domestic travelers already familiar with NYC.

New York is one of the most popular tourism destinations in the United States, and this new partnership may be the tipping point for additional American tourism organizations to partner with Booking.com and appeal to a more international audience.  A quick search also shows San Francisco's tourism site being powered by Booking.com.

From a supply perspective, Booking.com offers 573 properties while Expedia and Orbitz have 508 and 447 properties respectively.

Priceline jumps on the sponsored listings bandwagon and lets hotels advertise on search results

Priceline's new sponsored listings program for hotels looks pretty darn familiar.  Why?  Competitor OTAs like Expedia, Orbitz, and Travelocity have all featured pretty much the same product on their own search results pages for several years.  Just like display ads, the sponsored listings are also a complementary revenue stream to traditional OTA margins on the materialized bookings.

The sponsored listings are all auction based, pay per click campaigns that shoot hotels all the way up to the highly desired numero uno position in the search results of a particular destination.  In instances when there are pages upon pages of cookie cutter search results, it's easy for hotels buried deep into the dog pile to ascend to the top and gain maximum marketing exposure.  These sponsored hotels will get to sit in the spotlight with more or less free advertising unless someone clicks on their listing.

Since Priceline just launched their sponsored listings program last week, I would advise hotels interested in pay per click advertising to sign up ASAP and target their future lean occupancy dates.  The early adopters will enjoy low cost per click because there will be less competition bidding up the prices in the auction.  But winning isn't everything.  To improve the performance of their campaign, hotels absolutely need to ensure their rates are ultra competitive with the market and their inventory is well stocked to maximize conversion and ultimately the campaign's ROI.



As a consumer you can spot the hotels with sponsored listings because of their faded background color and typically the words "sponsored listing" near the hotel name.  In the example below of Expedia's search results for Bali, the Viceroy Bali is visibly designated as a sponsored listing and commands the #2 ranking after Mantra Nusa Dua (which is part of the Daily Deals merchandizing that trumps even sponsored listings).  Let's face it, getting to #2 in the rankings isn't too shabby when there's a whopping 874 other hotels listed beneath.

Hotel Quickly's last minute mobile rates not so exclusive

Hotel Quickly is the Hotel Tonight ripoff here in Asia.  Both have super sexy UX and pride themselves on fantastic deals at the last minute.  Every day at 12 noon local time, Hotel Quickly pushes out several hotel deals in key Asian destinations.  If you read the mobile FAQ on how it works, Hotel Quickly claims that its deals are exclusive to their app users.  I decided to put their claim to the test today.

For a one night stay arriving in Singapore tonight, Hotel Quickly offered six hotels.  Two were called 'prime', two were labeled as 'design', and the last two were classified as 'comfy'.  I decided to compare the rates and availability of these six hotels across some other popular mobile booking sites in Asia . . . specifically Agoda, Booking, and Expedia.

Here are the takeaways.  Keep in mind I compared all rates inclusive of taxes and service charges, the "all in" price.

1) Hotel Quickly (green bar in graph below) fell short of defending their value proposition, at least for today.  Their app didn't offer even one hotel that had rates lower than any other OTA's mobile app.  Even the featured hotel they recommended, identified by shaking the phone, was only on par with Agoda and Booking's rates.

2) Expedia (yellow bar in graph below) lost out in some way with four of these six hotels.  They didn't have availability or relationships with Hotel Royal at Queens or Grand Park Orchard, so these weren't bookable at all.  They did show availability at Amara and Ramada, but their rates were $30-40 SGD more than their competitors.  Yes, I made sure I compared the same room types.

Hotel Quickly has come out with aggressive marketing communications to create consumer perception that their rates are exclusive over other booking channels.  They also have a very clever kickback technique, including a referral program that snags users 10 USD in credits when friends make a booking with the user's unique invite code.  Although the average last minute consumer is less likely to compare prices across multiple mobile apps, Hotel Quickly needs to up the game on their so called exclusive rates if it wants to create real and sustainable value for its app users.  

Awaiting Hotel Tonight's imminent arrival to Asia

Awaiting Hotel Tonight's imminent arrival to Asia

In the last several years we've seen a surge in new mobile apps that allow travelers to book hotels for same day arrival.  Headliner apps that recently emerged include Hotel Tonight, Hotel Quickly, and Blink.  In fact, last minute and same day bookings have become such a hot topic that most of the traditional heavy hitters have also jumped in on the feeding frenzy.  Priceline has its Tonight Only deals, and Hotels.com has its Local Deals for Tonight, and recently Hipmunk launched its own Tonight Only deals.  This space is getting more crowded as travelers quickly migrate to mobile platforms.

(Sep 9 update - Blink just bought by Groupon)

Of the new mobile apps, one of them seems to be breaking away from the rest of the pack.  Hotel Tonight, a product of San Francisco, just received another $45 million in funding.  Despite growing skepticism that some of these last minute booking apps won't be around much longer, Hotel Tonight's funding seems to validate not only its existence but actually underscores its future growth potential.  So where will its future growth come from?

The obvious answer is global expansion.  When I whip out the app here in Singapore, I'm told that I'm too far away from any destinations where Hotel Tonight has deals.  Hotel Tonight has roughly 3,000 hotel partners in North American and European destinations, and it won't be long before they start making room for popular Asian cities and resorts.

Having millions in its war chest will help spur product innovation and marketing strategies and ultimately make the penetrating road to Asia a bit smoother.  But the money won't buy the strong relationships with hotel suppliers the company needs in order to get the best last minute rates for customers.  To build up their relationships (and relevance) with suppliers, Hotel Tonight will need to demonstrate its ability to drive last minute demand when they need it the most.  This won't be so easy since the company's existing demand profile is largely from North America and Europe, and data shows that the long haul traveler typically makes hotel bookings well in advance.  To be relevant in the same day or last minute window, Hotel Tonight will need to localize its app across the fragmented Asian nations to tap the growing local demand from domestic or intra-region travelers.  After all, these are the travelers that not only book at the last minute, but they book in volume.  Competition is hot though, and Asia is home to Agoda, Hotel Quickly, and Check In Tonight who have been sourcing deep hotel discounts on mobile platforms for a couple years already.

Apart from global expansion, I can see Hotel Tonight increasing their bookable inventory beyond same day arrival.  Although this will deviate from its current consumer messaging of booking a hotel for tonight (as the comapny name clearly suggests), I believe that adding inventory for a last minute booking window of within 7 days or so would still maintain a clear value proposition to both bookers and hotels.  I estimate that more than 50% of online bookings are made under seven days prior to arrival, so the size of the opportunity in this booking window is tremendous . . . especially for a company that has to date limited its focus to just same day arrival.

No Asian cities for now.  No . . . San Francisco and Vancouver don't count as Asian cities!